Pennsylvania Schools’ Funding Fight Pits District Against Charter - NYTimes.com
Pelham Math Committee Misrepresents Statistics in “Math War” over Curriculum | mathlovergrowsup
Wall Street steps in when Ivy League fails - The Washington Post
‘You are so smart…why did you become a teacher?’ - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post
Murphy: Higher ed in Colorado seeing higher costs than at Laramie - The Denver Post
Lawmakers propose scaling back 'zero tolerance' in schools | 9news.com
On Keeping Pledges » the scottbot irregular
Mooresville School District, a Laptop Success Story - NYTimes.com
Amidst Chaos, 15 Minutes of Quiet Time Helps Focus Students | MindShift
Colleges sell naming rights to bathrooms | Inside Higher Ed
Savage Inequalities: Bookapocalypse « prettylittlebanana
Education Gap Grows Between Rich and Poor, Studies Show - NYTimes.com
What should we be teaching? « The Window
Always Formative: Product Placement
Mathematics Education: Being Outwitted by Stupidity | Education News
http://www.educationnews.org/education-policy-and-politics/barry-garelick-mat...
Wow, the comments following this article are like a Math Wars All-Star Game, and both sides struggle to set up straw men fast enough to knock them back down again.But here's what really makes me mean: It's not that many of the commenters aren't trying to cite and link to research, because many of them are. But the research they should be linking to can't be linked to, because our silly academic publishing system keeps that locked away from the public eye. For example, commenter EANelson says, "For the cognitive science of learning (and teaching) math, see http://www.ams.org/notices/201010/rtx101001303p.pdf." It's a two page article with very few references, and at best it's a commentary piece, not anything close to a comprehensive take on the cognitive science of learning and teaching math. In contrast, consider a 2007 research handbook chapter written by Douglas Clements and Julie Sarama. Even after limiting themselves to just the cognitive science of learning math in early childhood, their summary of peer-reviewed research goes on for 95 very dense pages. But EANelson couldn't have linked to it, and neither (legally) can I. So while I dislike seeing the straw-man arguments, in some ways I can't blame them when the research community hasn't opened up all their results for the world to see.
(By the way, the article itself was based off think tank research, which often is available for public view and scrutiny. For my thoughts on that, see http://blog.mathed.net/2011/10/publication-paradox.html.)
Shop is Not a Four-Letter Word | Edutopia
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/shop-four-letter-word-jim-berman
Last Tuesday the students in my School and Society class had a conversation about whether or not they felt like attending college was a choice. Most of them come from privileged backgrounds, with college-educated parents, and not going to college simply wasn't a part of their culture. We'll talk a lot about expectations within cultures in that class, and I'm sure those discussions will include ideas and topics they've never had to think about before. I'm hoping the college decision is a good place to start that process.The conversation also led to talking about the value of vocational classes. In short, I'm pro-vocational, and I dislike the "college-prep-or-you're-a-failure" culture in many schools. While I didn't take any shop classes in high school (music was my primary elective), I learned a lot through helping my father, a trained mechanic and all-around handy guy. I've fixed appliances and engines, built a garage, shingled roofs, and learned a lot of other valuable skills that I wouldn't trade for college-prep knowledge.